How we can work together.

Four ways to get the evaluation you need, delivered at the speed and in the format that either proves impact or helps your programme work better.

Whether it's a programme you need to evaluate every year without an evaluator on staff, a signature initiative that can't afford to fail quietly, a case that has to survive a board or a funder, or a tender still being drafted, there's an entry point built for it below. These four are starting points: every programme is different, so treat what follows as a sense of scope. The actual engagement gets shaped around what you need, delivered at the quality and the speed it calls for.

NewIn-House Evaluation System for Nonprofits

The perfect solution for public and social organisations that run the same programme year after year and want an annual evaluation without the cost of an evaluation staff member or a research institute, which runs to more than ₪100,000 a year. Most of these programmes are measured today through satisfaction surveys, spot conversations, feedback and staff observations, because a full external evaluation or an in-house evaluation specialist is far beyond the budget. The process starts with defining the programme's theory of change, then building innovative, precise instruments to measure that change: quantitative questionnaires alongside behavioural tasks, simulations, open questions and qualitative tools coded against a fixed scheme.

While your first round of data collection runs, I build an independent analysis system around those instruments, including a static dashboard, and hand it over. From then on your team can run the evaluation year after year, compare the years, and see what changed in the programme. The system checks the data before anything is calculated, stops and explains when something is wrong, and produces a dashboard in your own branding for your management and donors. Pricing depends on the number of instruments and the volume of data, and comes to a quarter to half the cost of a research institute, an external evaluator or a full-time evaluation hire. Training and first-year support are included.

Start a conversation

Full Impact Evaluation

For programme managers running a technology or AI-driven initiative in education or sport who need more than an adoption number. I build a bespoke evaluation around your specific programme, drawing on established academic frameworks and validated instruments, then adapt them to what a real classroom or training ground can put into practice.

Alongside the numbers, I run a mix of qualitative methods suited to what's being measured, then use AI directly on that material to do in days what would otherwise take weeks. What comes out is evidence of real behavioural and psychological change, checked against a proper baseline, that your leadership, funders, and the people running the programme can all act on. It starts with a conversation about your programme's size and timeline, then a fixed-scope proposal built to match.

See it in practice: Project 720 Start a conversation

Board or Funder-Ready Impact Case

For anyone sitting on evidence, their own or ThinkerBox's, who has to put something credible in front of a board, a minister, or a funder, and knows "we ran a cohort" won't hold up under real questions.

I take the data as it stands and run it through the kind of scrutiny it'll face in that room: what result holds up on its own, where the sample or the method leaves a gap a sharp funder will spot, and what's missing that would strengthen the case. What comes back is a presentation built around what survives that pass.

See it in practice: Al Rowad Start a conversation

Tender-Ready Evaluation Design

For funding-scheme managers and agencies across the EU, Ireland and the US drafting a call or tender, and for the organisations preparing to bid into one, on a scheme that will eventually have to survive its own audit.

I design the measurement and evaluation framework directly into the call itself: the indicators, the data collection points, the evaluation timeline, before the programme starts running, so audits and reporting requirements are already accounted for once the call goes out. I also put together a capability statement you can attach to your own bids. The earlier this happens in the drafting process, the more it can shape the tender or the bid, ideally before the call issues at all.

Start a conversation

What's above is a sense of scope, here to give you an idea of what's possible. Every engagement gets shaped from scratch into the right package for what you actually need.

Start a conversation